Page
Diff
Editor
WikiProjects
Review
Diff
3,889
Education
History of Science
Project-independent assessment
Reviewed by: Diannaa
Permalink
Edit summary: As I said, what was not okay about the recent exclusion was that the person chose to single out one author from an entire section that consistently followed the same format across six entries (authors). This selective judgment appeared highly biased, which I found quite aggravating. Also, I was wrongly accused of directly writing the article, which I already explained it in the talk
Tags: Undo Reverted